When this MMY download record goes stale

This record describes the file served on 10 November 2026. The vendor can replace that file any day, and nothing on this site will know until someone measures the new one.

How you can tell the record has expired

The hash stops matching. That is the clean signal. A file that is the right size but fails the SHA-256 is not the recorded file, even if the version label still reads 2.2.5. A file of a different size has already failed the cheaper check, and the hash will fail too.

The version label is a poor signal. The vendor can ship a new build under the same 2.2.5 label with a higher version code, and the label on this site would still look right while describing the wrong bytes. The byte count and the hash are the checks that move when the file moves.

How to treat the record after that

Read it as history with a date on it. The package name, the version code, the permissions and the hash were true of the file measured on 10 November 2026. They are a description of that file, and they stay useful as a comparison point: a new file that differs is identifiable precisely because this record exists.

What you should not do is install a non-matching file on the strength of these pages. The pages vouch for one set of bytes. A different set of bytes is outside what was measured, and the honest statement is that this site has nothing to say about it.

What stays true regardless

• The method. Size, then version code, then hash, in that order, on whatever file you actually received.
• The distinction between the two files. A channel marker changes the size by roughly 95 KB and changes the package name, so two icons named MMY can be two apps.
• The limits of a hash. A match proves the bytes, not the behaviour, because the game scripts are encrypted.

What a newer file would need

A fresh download, a fresh byte count, a fresh dump for the version code and package name, and a fresh hash. Until those exist, the only defensible description of a non-matching file is its size and the fact that it was not measured here. Guessing at its version or its contents would repeat the failure this site exists to avoid.

If you are holding a file that fails the hash today, the checksum page covers the commands and the size page covers the truncated-download case, which is the usual reason for a mismatch.